The Chatbot Fantasy

When executives hear "AI in IT operations," they immediately picture a magical chatbot sitting in Slack, ready to answer every question, resolve every ticket, and automate every workflow.

It is an appealing vision. One interface to rule them all.

But here is what I have learned after working on dozens of AI implementations: the all-knowing chatbot is almost always the wrong approach.

Key Insight

The most successful AI deployments are not generalist chatbots. They are narrow, specialized agents that deeply understand one workflow and execute it exceptionally well.

Why Specialized Agents Win

Think about how your IT team actually works. A ticket comes in. Someone reads it, categorizes it, checks if there is a known solution, routes it to the right team, maybe triggers an approval workflow.

Each of these steps has its own context, its own rules, its own edge cases.

A generalist chatbot tries to handle all of this with one model, one prompt, one set of instructions. It is like hiring one person and expecting them to be excellent at triage, networking, security, and application support simultaneously.

The Agent Architecture

Instead, consider building a team of agents:

Triage Agent: Reads incoming tickets, extracts intent and entities, classifies priority
Knowledge Agent: Searches your KB and past tickets to surface relevant solutions
Routing Agent: Understands team capabilities and makes intelligent assignment decisions
Approval Agent: Handles change management workflows and tracks SLAs

Each agent does one thing well. Together, they are more powerful than any single chatbot.

In my next post, I will dive deep into building the Triage Agent specifically, including intent recognition, entity extraction, and confidence scoring.

Things I Write About